logo

Date  Headline

  • 10.04.2017
    Kitcatt & Ors v MMS UK Holdings Ltd.; Publicis Groupe SA [2017] EWHC 786 (Comm)
    • Key areas: both parties win some issues; High Court

      This was a ruling on costs and other issues arising from a main action.  The Claimants won on some issues against the First Defendant, but lost the claim against the Second Defendant.

      The Defendants argued that they should only pay 50% of the Claimants’ costs and the Claimants should pay the Second Defendant’s costs.

      The Court held that the claim against the Second Defendant did not make any difference to the overall costs as both Defendants used the same solicitors and only made a minimal increase to the overall trial.

      The Defendant submitted that the Claimants’ costs should be reduced because they did not follow the relevant Pre-Action Protocol; made unfounded allegations of bad faith; served correspondence that gave a misleading impression case; and they changed their case.

      The Court noted that the Claimants’ conduct increased the costs, but the Defendants did not try to settle the claim.

      As a result, the Claimants were awarded 75% of their costs.

Thomas Legal Costs

Token House
12 Token House Yard
London
EC2R 7AS
DX 138752 CHEAPSIDE

Thames House
18 Park Street
London
SE1 9EQ

T: 020 7073 2600
F: 020 7073 2955
E: info@thomas-legal.com